Two Rivers expansion

Moved from overbuilt Pinellas and fears repeating it; questioned impact fees and where surf park workers would live.

Argued the 'third place' already exists — nature — and warned development here damages Hillsborough River headwaters and sacred ancestral lands.

Crystal Springs resident asking 'what will it take' for the county to stop development, questioning water for the surf park.

Returned to urge denial until roads, water, and infrastructure catch up: 'It's like Tampa's come to Zephyr Hills.'

Urged denial, saying Two Rivers was old-growth forest cut and logged, and the community is being consumed rather than built.

Sierra Club vice chairman and Marine veteran asked for denial or delay, questioning how the county pays for growth if the property tax amendment passes.

Asked what changed since 2008 to justify the increase, questioned stormwater modeling, and criticized the afternoon meeting time excluding working residents.

A young resident calculated the surf park could need 17-19 million gallons to fill, arguing the aquifer can't support it.

Tampa Bay Sierra Club chair asked for denial or a continuance to coordinate with Hillsborough County on cross-border impacts.

A Two Rivers resident spoke in support, praising the developer's conservation, preserves, and flood-conscious design.

Supported assisted living beds but worried Pasco will need to buy 33 million gallons of water daily from Hillsborough within a decade.

Wanted to see actual architecture and asked whether the surf park will be open to the public — a question that shaped the final condition.

Lives 1,000 feet from the project; said she's heard 'a lot of words from salesmen' with no real traffic or water planning.

Said she has a hydraulics degree, cited dry wells and falling springs, and pushed back when pressed to substantiate her figures.