Florida Record
Miami
Sunday, November 8, 2026

Miami · week of October 31, 2026

Council approves Historic designation boundary amendment, First Presbyterian Church, 609 Brickell Avenue, 6–1

Summarized from the official meeting transcript — every claim links to the moment it was said. How we make this

What changed in Miami

Development activity

  • Southwest Seventh Street Corridor Project – Rezone (File ID 20076)

    Properties fronting SW 7th Street between SW 30th and SW 32nd Avenues, Miami, FL (master address 725 SW 32nd Ave)

    A city-initiated rezone of 55 properties from T3-L (Sub-Urban Limited) to T3-O (Sub-Urban Open) to allow two-family residences and unify the corridor's transect intensity.

    approved (9-0) · still approved

    Track this project →

  • Southwest Seventh Street Corridor Project – Comprehensive Plan Amendment (File ID 20077)

    Properties fronting SW 7th Street between SW 30th and SW 32nd Avenues, incl. 725 SW 32nd Ave, 710/713/725/760 SW 31st Ave, 2972–2995 SW 7th St, 701 SW 30th Ave, and 3003 SW 8th St, Miami, FL

    A city-initiated small-scale amendment changing the future land use designation from Single Family Residential to Duplex Residential for 56 corridor properties and to Restricted Commercial for the bifurcated 3003 SW 8th Street parcel.

    approved (9-0) · still approved

    Track this project →

  • Special certificate of appropriateness — garage enclosure and deck

    7650 Northeast Fifth Avenue, Miami, FL 33138

    Garage conversion to living space, new windows, deck, and cedar fence at a contributing Palm Grove ranch house, approved with conditions.

    still conditions-required

    Track this project →

  • First Presbyterian Church designation boundary amendment

    609 Brickell Avenue, Miami, FL 33131

    Amendment to the 2003 designation shrinking the boundary to the 1949 sanctuary, classifying the annex and parking lot as non-contributing, over a 6-1 vote.

    approved (6-1) · still approved

    Track this project →

  • Crow Creek Impact Fund appeal — 221 NE 36th Street

    221 Northeast 36th Street, Miami, FL

    A standing-challenged appeal continued to December 1 because the appellant's attorney did not appear.

    tabled · still tabled

    Track this project →

  • Miami 21 exception — continued non-conforming multifamily use

    175 Northeast 45th Street, Miami, FL 33137

    A recommendation to PZAB to let a 1971 multifamily building keep its use in the T3-O zone of Buena Vista Historic District.

    approved (7-0) · still approved

    Track this project →

  • 3201 Day Avenue Tree Removal Appeal

    3201 Day Avenue, Miami, FL

    Neighbor's appeal of an intended decision allowing removal of nine hardwood trees and palms for a new two-story house was withdrawn after a settlement.

    still withdrawn

    Track this project →

  • Addition and site improvements, Bayside Historic District

    747 Northeast 72nd Street, Miami, FL 33138

    A rear addition, partial demolition, new driveway, and pool at a contributing Bayside District home, approved with amended conditions.

    still conditions-required

    Track this project →

Also discussed

  • King Tide Flood Monitoring and Seawall Adaptation

    October's king tide hit 1.8 feet above prediction and tied hurricane-era records at the Virginia Key gauge — six of the ten highest water levels ever recorded there happened this year, none during storms. The city is raising 18 seawalls, including an 8-foot, 1,800-foot wall on Brickell Bay Drive starting 2027, and installing 80 more backflow preventers, but members say seawall height standards need reevaluation.

    What it means: Residents in flood-prone neighborhoods like Flagami and Brickell who face repetitive tidal flooding.

    Follow this issue →

  • Tree Preservation Regulations and Zoning Incentives

    A proposal to replace Miami's flat mitigation fees with a formula valuing a tree's height, canopy and trunk could make removals of large oaks far more expensive and small trees cheaper. FIU research found Miami's current fees undervalue big tree loss by more than threefold.

    What it means: Residents who benefit from shade, cooling, and stormwater control provided by large trees.

    Follow this issue →

  • Early tree review in development review

    The committee zeroed in on making tree review happen at the sketch stage — before developers sink hundreds of thousands into engineering — possibly through pre-application meetings developers would even pay for, plus possible private-provider sign-off for smaller projects.

    What it means: Developers get certainty early; residents get buildings designed around trees instead of around them.

    Follow this issue →

  • Simpler tree permits for homesteaded properties

    The idea of cutting arborist reports and paperwork for homeowners drew support, but only for pruning — several members worry removal rules shouldn't be loosened just because someone has a homestead exemption.

    What it means: Homeowners who find current tree permitting confusing and expensive.

    Follow this issue →

  • Appeals and stays for tree removal decisions

    Members told of developers cutting down trees on a Saturday before an appeal could be filed, including a Northeast 68th Street oak. The committee wants an immediate stay during the appeal window and an easier path to standing for residents and groups like the Sierra Club.

    What it means: Neighbors and groups who want their day in court before a mature tree comes down.

    Follow this issue →

  • Omni CRA Tree Preservation and Relocation Program

    Members floated a city-coordinated system to move large healthy trees slated for demolition to parks, school land, or other developments instead of losing them — possibly with a registry matching sending and receiving sites, similar to Coral Gables' practice.

    What it means: Parks, schools, and developers seeking specimen trees, and the whole city's canopy.

    Follow this issue →

  • Adaptive Reuse Permitting and Regulations

    Several owners said they're stuck waiting on the city — tree permits in review since August, address legalization plans in second review, and expediter applications that expire. The magistrate acknowledged the holiday slowdown and small review staff.

    What it means: Nobody directly — though patient owners keep getting extensions instead of daily fines.

    Follow this issue →

  • Back Bay coastal storm risk management study (Phase 2)

    Members are frustrated they still haven't gotten a full county/Army Corps briefing on the Back Bay flood protection study or the 2-16 Miami River Basin study. The Corps' website says floodproofing of up to 100 critical infrastructure assets starts early, with the final report due summer 2027.

    What it means: The Phase 2 budget concentrates most dollars on elevating structures; floodproofing of 100 critical assets starts first.

    Follow this issue →

  • Tree Permitting and Code Enforcement

    Committee members are beginning to tackle the permitting process for tree removal and pruning, looking at ways to ease paperwork for homesteaded properties while increasing fines and penalties for illegal tree cutting.

    What it means: Homesteaded property owners will see reduced administrative burdens for routine tree care.

    Follow this issue →

  • Ground Floor Heights and Freeboard Policy

    The committee is moving toward recommending updated rules for how high new buildings must sit above flood levels. ARUP's presentation showed how other cities harmonize conflicting flood elevation standards — Miami wants to get ahead of development before billions more in projects are built.

    What it means: Future residents and property owners in new buildings that will be better protected from rising flood levels.

    Follow this issue →

  • Unpermitted Construction and Tree Removals

    Members want the cost of illegally removing or topping trees to actually deter violations, with questions about who counts as the violator — the property owner or the contractor — and possible Broward-style licensing for tree trimmers.

    What it means: Neighborhoods that lose mature trees to midnight chainsaw work today.

    Follow this issue →

  • Tree ordinance and FLORA review

    The tree ordinance advisory group is working toward a January report, exploring canopy-based mitigation fees, tree banks to save specimen trees (Coral Gables has a model program), a pre-application review process for developers, and penalties for bad actors.

    What it means: Residents citywide who benefit from tree canopy for heat, flooding and air quality, and developers who'd get early clarity on requirements.

    Follow this issue →

  • Blight and Abandoned Property Enforcement

    An absent owner of a vacant lot at 624 NW 65th Street was hit with $500/day fines for an unregistered, junk-filled lot — the city's way of pressuring absentee owners to clean up.

    What it means: $500/day lien after 7 days against the absentee owner.

    Follow this issue →

  • Chapter 163 preemption loophole

    State law lets owners remove trees with just an arborist report, bypassing city rules. Andy Parrish circulated a memo arguing the city should push back against this preemption as far as legally possible, because heavier penalties may just push more people to use the loophole.

    What it means: Property owners who want to remove trees without city review.

    Follow this issue →

  • City-Wide Greenway Public Benefits Program and Miami Loop

    District 4's office is stitching Miami's individual trail projects into one connected loop crossing all five districts, with $8 million newly secured for the Ludlam Trail and a Greenway Trust Fund that lets developers pay into trail construction. It's pitched as a climate win too — getting people out of cars and onto safe, connected paths.

    What it means: $8 million in Ludlam Trail funding secured so far, plus a developer-funded Greenway Trust Fund for trail design and construction.

    Follow this issue →

  • Unpermitted Construction and Remodeling Compliance

    A 92-year-old woman is living in a partially stripped house after contractors took her money and left permits expired. She's seeking city repair funds, and the magistrate gave her 120 days at only $50/day while the city and District 5 try to help.

    What it means: Reduced fine of $50/day after 120 days; she's seeking city repair funding.

    Follow this issue →

  • Brickell Avenue Environmental Preservation & Bluff Restoration

    Residents raised alarms about a reported 54-tree removal permit (later described as nine trees plus palms), no archaeological assessment ahead of construction, and a vanished public hearing notice sign.

    What it means: Residents gain if tree canopy and archaeological resources are protected through review.

    Follow this issue →

  • Impermeable parking surface in Buena Vista

    Board members flagged a fully asphalted front yard at 175 NE 45th Street as a stormwater concern and recommended PZAB require permeable surfacing.

    What it means: Neighbors and the city's stormwater system benefit from reduced runoff.

    Follow this issue →

  • First Presbyterian Church historic boundary reduction

    The board voted to shrink the church's 2003 historic designation from the full three-acre bayfront parcel to just the 1949 sanctuary, reclassifying the school annex and parking lot as non-contributing. That clears the way for a Foster and Partners tower behind the church, which Icon Brickell neighbors fought hard to stop.

    What it means: The growing congregation gains funding and new facilities while keeping its sanctuary.

    Follow this issue →

  • Permitting Process Clarity and Inter-agency Coordination

    A city video explained the building department's concierge program to fast-track affordable housing permits through one point of contact.

    What it means: Affordable housing developers and future residents waiting for units.

    Follow this issue →

  • Southwest 7th Street Corridor duplex zoning

    The city wants to legalize the duplex pattern already existing along Southwest 7th Street by upzoning 55 properties from T3-L to T3-O and amending the future land use map. Residents could build two-family homes; the change also buffers the Tamiami Trail commercial strip from single-family blocks to the north.

    What it means: Homeowners on the corridor who want to build, convert to, or legally maintain duplexes.

    Follow this issue →

  • Illegal Dumping and Swale Maintenance Enforcement

    Multiple cases involved vacant lots and boarded buildings turned dumping grounds — including four Palmetto Homes lots continued to November 17 and a repeat-offender commercial building hit with $500-a-day fines. Neighbors bear the brunt of trash, squatters, and fire risks.

    What it means: Daily fines of $250 to $500 per property accrue where owners fail to clean up within compliance windows.

    Follow this issue →

  • Unpermitted Construction and Residential Conversions

    A Shenandoah-area house at 1651 SW 13th Ave kept running Airbnb bookings despite citations, with out-of-state guests and parties disturbing neighbors. The Board found guilt and gave the owner only 3 days before $250-a-day fines start.

    What it means: The owner faces $250-a-day fines starting after a 3-day compliance window on top of prosecution costs.

    Follow this issue →

  • Lien relief for affordable housing and hardship owners

    The Board erased nearly $700,000 in liens across cases involving a nonprofit affordable-housing builder, a homesteaded family home in probate limbo, and a lifelong resident. The relief clears the way for a planned nine-unit apartment building and other compliance.

    What it means: The city forgoes roughly $673,000 in accrued lien value across the zero-reduction cases alone.

    Follow this issue →

  • Illegal Dwellings and Unsanitary Conditions

    Several homes were cited for garage conversions, illegal triplex setups, and work done without permits — some owners claiming they inherited problems from prior owners. The Board consistently gave 120 days where owners were actively permitting, and 3 days where they weren't.

    What it means: Owners face per diem fines of $250 plus the cost of after-the-fact permitting and, in some cases, demolition.

    Follow this issue →

Published by Florida Record. 6 meetings covered.