Florida Record
Clay County
Zoning

COMP 25-0015

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (1)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Feb 24, 2026.

Public comments (6)

MixedJason McKenzieFeb 24, 2026

Wants the developer's verbal promises on buffers legally binding and prefers a 0% residential maximum in the half-moon area.

Board of County Commissioners Meeting - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:52:22 →
MixedTommy ChildressFeb 24, 2026

The Village Park HOA president supported the expansion but wants no apartments or townhomes in the half-moon parcel fronting his neighborhood.

Board of County Commissioners Meeting - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:45:05 →
MixedGary SchiffFeb 24, 2026

Supported more retail but pushed for a 0% residential maximum, citing falling home values and wanting buffering for 16 homes abutting the project.

Board of County Commissioners Meeting - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:48:20 →
OpposedBob NeelyFeb 24, 2026

Said apartments or townhouses don't fit his retirement neighborhood and affordable housing should be built as its own neighborhood, not in a corner of Village Park.

Board of County Commissioners Meeting - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:51:11 →
ConcernedHelana CormierFeb 24, 2026

The CAC chair who cast the lone no vote explained concerns about the two IVC master plans no longer matching and about changes made between hearings.

Board of County Commissioners Meeting - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:54:03 →
ConcernedUnidentified ResidentFeb 24, 2026

Pressed staff on whether the half-moon could end up with commercial uses like a gas station or light industrial instead of staying rural or becoming a pond.

Board of County Commissioners Meeting - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:00:31 →