Development
Bayard Road industrial rezonings
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (4)
Related issue
Bayard Road heavy industrial rezonings→At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 6, 2026.
Public comments (4)
OpposedMary SchumacherOct 6, 2026
40-year CR 209 South resident asked for denial over aquifer/well risks, wetlands and flooding, and questioned moving the industrial boundary south of CR 226.
Planning Commission Meeting - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:39:16 →OpposedJames BodlackOct 6, 2026
27-year resident with 32 acres on 209 South warned about wildlife corridors, truck traffic, and property values along the rural road.
Planning Commission Meeting - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:42:32 →OpposedTrish RossOct 6, 2026
Said she shares the jobs concern but questioned the location surrounded by conservation land, citing flooding and asking for stronger road protections for residents.
Planning Commission Meeting - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:45:58 →OpposedRobert PatakaOct 6, 2026
Read the traffic study and doubted trucks will use JP Hall Road, citing torn-up CR 226, blocked 209 South, and poor Decoy Road conditions.
Planning Commission Meeting - Oct 6, 2026 · 3:49:22 →