Parking pressure on Huntington Avenue
Summary
A triplex owner has parked for years on a pad that sits partly on the applicant's property and partly in the public right-of-way, and the new home's driveway would eliminate it. The board said it's a private dispute to resolve before permits, but suggested the triplex property has room for a replacement pad that would need its own variance.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 17, 2026.
Impact analysis
Adding a replacement parking pad on the triplex property could cost the triplex owners, and may require hiring help for a new variance application.
The applicant gains legal access and parking for the new home; the triplex owner could gain a dedicated replacement space if a solution is reached.
Shan-Estelle Brown of 803 Huntington Court loses the parking spot she has relied on unless a replacement is provided.
Mentions & discussions (1)
Related development
BOA #26-01 — 1781 Via Tuscany single-family home
The new house will sit in line with neighboring homes rather than far behind them, preserving a reasonable building pad on the deep lot.
BOA #26-02 — 653 Huntington Avenue single-family home
A long-vacant sliver lot gets a small home, but the driveway will eliminate a pad a triplex neighbor has parked on — a dispute the city says the private parties must resolve before a certificate of occupancy.
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Winter Park
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.