Zoning

CPA #25-05 — Merrywood lot split

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (2)Neutral (2)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 2, 2026.

Public comments (7)

SupportiveTara TedrowJun 2, 2026

The applicant said 11 months of efforts to find a buyer to preserve Merrywood failed, a structural report found the house should not be saved, and a two-lot split with home-size caps better protects neighborhood character than a possible 50,000+ square-foot mansion.

Planning and Zoning Board - Jun 2, 2026 · 0:00 →
SupportiveMick NightJun 2, 2026

Spoke in favor of the proposed lot-split amendment.

Planning and Zoning Board - Jun 2, 2026 · 0:00 →
SupportiveDavid BornsteinJun 2, 2026

Spoke in favor of the proposed lot-split amendment.

Planning and Zoning Board - Jun 2, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedAimee SpencerJun 2, 2026

Spoke in opposition to the proposed lot-split amendment.

Planning and Zoning Board - Jun 2, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedMichael SpencerJun 2, 2026

Spoke in opposition to the proposed lot-split amendment.

Planning and Zoning Board - Jun 2, 2026 · 0:00 →
NeutralJohn SkolfieldJun 2, 2026

Commented but did not state a position on the request.

Planning and Zoning Board - Jun 2, 2026 · 0:00 →
NeutralScott PeelenJun 2, 2026

Commented but did not state a position on the request.

Planning and Zoning Board - Jun 2, 2026 · 0:00 →