Development

11000 Okeechobee Road PUD

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (8)

At a glance

Public comments
8
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Apr 16, 2026.

Public comments (8)

OpposedRobin KimmelmanApr 16, 2026

Spoke briefly and yielded her time to George Emerson.

Planning & Zoning Commission - Apr 16, 2026 · 1:41:06 →
OpposedTom RichmondApr 16, 2026

Spoke briefly and yielded his time to George Emerson.

Planning & Zoning Commission - Apr 16, 2026 · 1:41:35 →
OpposedPete McLeodApr 16, 2026

Spoke briefly and yielded his time to George Emerson.

Planning & Zoning Commission - Apr 16, 2026 · 1:41:49 →
OpposedPaula BeatonApr 16, 2026

Spoke briefly and yielded her time to George Emerson.

Planning & Zoning Commission - Apr 16, 2026 · 1:41:59 →
OpposedStephanie KimmelmanApr 16, 2026

Said she canvassed Pine Hollow door to door and found no neighborhood support for the project among 111 residents contacted, then yielded her remaining time.

Planning & Zoning Commission - Apr 16, 2026 · 1:42:07 →
OpposedGeorge EmersonApr 16, 2026

Representing 178 property owners with 116 properties, argued the project conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan, removes the AG-2.5 rural buffer, promotes leapfrog sprawl outside the Urban Services Boundary, and sets a bad precedent.

Planning & Zoning Commission - Apr 16, 2026 · 1:42:42 →
OpposedBrett McCainApr 16, 2026

Argued the applicant's justification was about development costs, not valid planning reasons, and cited data showing small-lot developments underperform larger rural lots by about 10% in value.

Planning & Zoning Commission - Apr 16, 2026 · 1:54:52 →
OpposedChris JonesApr 16, 2026

Said residents are tired of constant development and urged the board to preserve the rural character and keep the existing zoning.

Planning & Zoning Commission - Apr 16, 2026 · 1:58:33 →