Automated license plate readers in county rights-of-way
Summary
Residents packed the room on both sides of the Flock camera debate. Critics cited privacy, data sharing, and misreads; supporters cited solved crimes and missing-person cases. The board revoked the right-of-way permits 3-2 while awaiting state legislation.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 31
- Last 30 days
- 20
Discussed at 4 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Nov 3, 2026.
Impact analysis
No direct cost to taxpayers to revoke, but removing and reinstalling cameras would carry future costs; the cameras were funded through subscriptions and grants.
Residents concerned about privacy and mass surveillance get a pause on county-road cameras.
Crime victims and investigators lose a tool supporters say has solved robberies, protected stalking victims, and aided missing-person cases.
Mentions & discussions (9)
Board of County Commissioners - Nov 3, 2026
Residents asked why 71 of 89 automatic license plate reader cameras on county rights-of-way were installed without permits, questioned audio recording legality and liability, and urged a removal timeline.
Board of County Commissioners - Oct 20, 2026
Residents packed the room on both sides of the Flock camera debate. Critics cited privacy, data sharing, and misreads; supporters cited solved crimes and missing-person cases. The board revoked the right-of-way permits 3-2 while awaiting state legislation.
Board of County Commissioners - Oct 6, 2026
A federal judge ruled October 1 that warrantless tracking through Flock's camera network is unconstitutional mass surveillance, and residents are demanding the county act — one speaker showed her plate was wrongly linked to 11 different cars. The board agreed to hold a dedicated Flock discussion at its October 20 meeting.
Special Board of County Commissioners - Sep 15, 2026
Roughly 15 residents urged the board to strip funding for the Sheriff's Flock camera network, citing one-year data retention, sharing with federal agencies, AI tracking, and security breaches. The Sheriff defended the system with case outcomes and said data sharing is off and state-road cameras come down this month; the board took no vote but agreed to get funding options and legal analysis back within two weeks.
Board of County Commissioners - Sep 15, 2026
Roughly 180 Flock cameras record vehicles on county roads, with data retained one year and shared with federal agencies. Speaker after speaker demanded removal or strict limits, citing privacy, security breaches, and ICE/CBP data sharing; the board agreed to bring back funding options for county right-of-way cameras.
Board of County Commissioners - Sep 3, 2026
Six residents urged the board to cut the roughly $500,000 Flock camera line item and redirect the money to deputy pay and cold case investigations, citing privacy, Fourth Amendment, and liability concerns. Sheriff Hardwick defended the system, saying only $481,000 of the cost is discretionary, data isn't shared with outside agencies, and funds could go to jail programs if the system is removed. The board adopted the budget with the cameras funded, but a state directive requires cameras to come off state rights-of-way.
Board of County Commissioners - Sep 1, 2026
Residents repeatedly urged the County to end its automated license plate reader program, citing out-of-state data searches and noting Duval and Putnam counties dropped theirs. Sheriff budget requests may add more funding for the cameras.
Board of County Commissioners - Aug 18, 2026
Residents keep pressing the board over the sheriff's expanding Flock camera network — one presented a 464-signature petition, another cited roughly $4 million spent since 2022, and a third asked for an independent audit before any expansion. The board took no action; a draft ordinance and charter amendment petitions were submitted as exhibits.
Board of County Commissioners - Aug 4, 2026
Multiple speakers opposed the county's network of 160+ Flock license plate readers, citing Fourth Amendment concerns, data access by outside agencies, and an $875 records fee. They asked the county to remove the cameras or require public hearings before new surveillance is bought.
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for St. Johns County
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.