Tree ordinance interpretation
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Tree ordinance mitigation interpretation→At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 1
Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Nov 2, 2026.
Public comments (3)
The attorney who drafted the 2020 tree ordinance says staff is misinterpreting the mitigation provision, letting people get credit for preserving already-protected trees. He asked to be placed on the December agenda for a recommendation vote.
Ponte Vedra Zoning and Adjustment Board - Nov 2, 2026 · 2:36 →The MSD chairman asked the board to add the tree ordinance misinterpretation to its agenda, saying the 2020 ordinance went through full review by the MSD, this board, and the county commission.
Ponte Vedra Zoning and Adjustment Board - Sep 14, 2026 · 2:30 →The land-use attorney and original author of the tree ordinance says a mitigation credit provision is being misread, letting people eliminate protected 10-inch-plus oaks without the required 2-to-1 mitigation. He recommends clarifying the language or eliminating the credit entirely.
Ponte Vedra Zoning and Adjustment Board - Sep 14, 2026 · 2:50 →