Inman Road PUD
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Industrial growth at 3960 Inman Road→At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 5
Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Nov 3, 2026.
Public comments (7)
FOP president asked the commission to deny or postpone the project, citing traffic and suggesting SR 207 as an alternative site.
Board of County Commissioners - Nov 3, 2026 · 2:05:16 →Tuscany Village resident who attended all PZA hearings questioned driveway counts and truck traffic on Outlet Center Drive.
Board of County Commissioners - Nov 3, 2026 · 1:56:44 →Master developer and county resident urged approval, calling the project a dramatic improvement over the Amazon entitlement.
Board of County Commissioners - Nov 3, 2026 · 1:44:32 →Property owner described his family's financial struggles since purchasing the land in 2014 and asked for approval.
Board of County Commissioners - Nov 3, 2026 · 2:23:31 →Criticized the non-residential concurrency exemption, noting 44% of county roads exceed capacity and that Amazon traffic isn't counted in the 184% committed figure.
Planning and Zoning Agency - Oct 15, 2026 · 59:03 →Not opposed but asked that all retail be banned and questioned who will improve Inman Road and whether trucks will really avoid Outlet Center Drive.
Planning and Zoning Agency - Oct 15, 2026 · 1:03:43 →FOP lodge president asked the board to use common sense and not add 400-500 vehicles to already gridlocked State Road 16.
Planning and Zoning Agency - Oct 15, 2026 · 1:05:21 →