ENCERT 2026-01

Colony resident asked the board to deny the Palm Valley enclave that borders her neighborhood.

Marsh Landing resident questioned fill requirements, flooding, and the lack of environmental studies.

Ponte Vedra resident asked for denial, citing roads, schools, wildlife, and the eagle's nest.

Attorney for anonymous residents argued the enclave statute requires actual development, not just subdivision of land.

Urged Murphy to join Joseph and Taylor in protecting the untouched ICW shoreline; thanked the board after the denial.

Fairfield subdivision resident said A1A and Palm Valley roads are maxed out and suggested preserving a wildlife buffer.

Audubon Florida advocate argued the parcels didn't exist as configured on January 1, 2025, so the law shouldn't apply.

Asked 'what is the rush?' and urged denial so courts can settle the law.

Applicant's attorney objected to a third hearing on Palm Valley and presented the AFI application's statutory compliance.

Opposed the enclave over parcel boundary concerns and later spoke against fighting SB 686.

Urged the board to deny the enclave application.