Colee Cove Tower
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Colee Cove Tower and Scenic Highway Character→At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 4
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 20, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Urged the Board to deny the Colee Cove tower.
Board of County Commissioners - Oct 20, 2026 · 0:00 →Opposed the tower as incompatible with the area.
Board of County Commissioners - Oct 20, 2026 · 0:00 →Opposed the tower's effects on his property.
Board of County Commissioners - Oct 20, 2026 · 0:00 →Opposed the Colee Cove cell tower.
Board of County Commissioners - Oct 20, 2026 · 0:00 →Scenic highway advocate argued the tower fails LDC 6.08.12P compatibility standards, especially if the neighboring silviculture parcel is harvested and the tower becomes fully exposed.
Planning and Zoning Agency - Jul 23, 2026 · 3:48:00 →Attorney for the Colognes presented their own wetland delineation showing larger wetlands than the applicant's, and argued the tower is at bare-minimum setbacks with fire risk in an area with no water service.
Planning and Zoning Agency - Jul 23, 2026 · 3:55:34 →The 52-year Fruit Cove resident owns the adjacent timber parcel and said a tower 35 feet from his line would block the development he hopes to leave to his children; he turned the same company down in 2024.
Planning and Zoning Agency - Jul 23, 2026 · 3:58:47 →Said Colee Cove is a tight-knit rural community that doesn't yet warrant a tower, wants the applicant to wait five to ten years, and would buy the parcel himself for horse pasture if the tower is denied.
Planning and Zoning Agency - Jul 23, 2026 · 3:55:14 →Heir to the Sturm property to the north said the tower would spoil plans to develop $1.3 million estates like those on nearby Joe Ashton Road.
Planning and Zoning Agency - Jul 23, 2026 · 4:04:21 →