Code Enforcement
Ludwigsky tree removal (2026-525)
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (2)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 2
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 22, 2026.
Public comments (2)
OpposedKristin CupOct 22, 2026
Said she relied on a certified arborist's letter that turned out to be wrong, already paid $3,000, and argued the residential-parcel interpretation is disputable.
Code Compliance Hearings - Oct 22, 2026 · 38:30 →OpposedAndrea RossiOct 22, 2026
Argued the site is effectively residential and disputed that the removal warranted the full fine; noted the city refused to negotiate outside the magistrate process.
Code Compliance Hearings - Oct 22, 2026 · 39:43 →