Amendment 3 and Flock surveillance
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 14, 2026.
Public comments (2)
Said he's voting no on Amendment 3 because parks would be an early cut target, and praised the Flock camera suspension while urging the city not to adopt similar tech from competitors like Axon, arguing license-plate cameras amount to an unregulable surveillance state.
CITY COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AND ANNUAL BUDGET HEARING - Sep 14, 2026 · 2:13:00 →Urged everyone to vote no on Amendment 3, warning parks would be the first cut if the city loses millions, and applauded the Flock camera suspension while asking the city not to just switch to another surveillance vendor.
City Commission (Work) - Sep 14, 2026 · 2:12:37 →