Buffer wall waiver along the C-24 canal
Summary
A retail development wants a dense 6-foot hedge instead of the code-required wall along the canal, across from homes. A resident whose backyard faces the site begged the board to require the wall, arguing landscaping dies and doesn't protect privacy. The board sided with the applicant but added extra plantings.
At a glance
- Total mentions
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 2, 2026.
Impact analysis
Saves the developer the cost of a masonry wall, but the added landscaping condition increases the planting bill.
The developer, whose narrow site can't easily fit a wall outside the utility easement.
Residents across the canal who say a hedge won't screen headlights, noise and their backyards like a wall would.
Mentions & discussions (1)
We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.
The weekly brief for Port St. Lucie
What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.
Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.