Tradition MPUD amendment
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 13, 2026.
Public comments (7)
A Southgate resident asked the council to reconsider the zoning change, suggested fountains to mitigate sound, and urged the developer to be considerate of protected nesting species along the water.
City Council — July 13, 2026 · 26:04 →A resident within 750 feet of the property opposed the residential-to-commercial rezoning, citing lack of transparency, missing traffic and wetland studies, and threats to property values and neighborhood character.
City Council — July 13, 2026 · 28:31 →Also living 750 feet from the property, she urged rejection of the rezoning, saying finalized plans should come before any approval and that the 9.4 acres should remain residential to protect wildlife, green space, and home values.
City Council — July 13, 2026 · 32:08 →Urged that road/traffic issues at Crosstown and Village Parkway be fixed before any construction, and asked for a higher berm and wall to protect neighbors' privacy.
City Council — May 26, 2026 · 1:08:38 →Wants privacy preserved (taller berm and wall), says the neighborhood already has two access points and doesn't want a through street, and asked the council to deny the commercial application if they can't restrict uses like gas stations.
City Council — May 26, 2026 · 1:10:42 →Opposed the rezoning, citing mature trees, wildlife habitat, property values and overdevelopment; questioned the lack of a site plan for the commercial use.
City Council — May 26, 2026 · 1:13:49 →Doesn't want a third entrance/exit, questioned the engineer's traffic numbers, wants more security, and noted there are already gas stations nearby.
City Council — May 26, 2026 · 1:17:30 →