Tradition cell tower
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 6, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Worried about helicopter flight paths to the hospital and questioned why a new tower is needed when the I-95 tower is less than a mile away.
Planning and Zoning Board — October 6, 2026 · 54:33 →A Heritage Oaks lakefront homeowner says the tower would compound earlier commercial rezoning impacts on his community's character and property values.
Planning and Zoning Board — October 6, 2026 · 55:31 →Says the applicant hasn't proven a real coverage gap or least-intrusive siting and wants a third-party RF analysis before a 15-story tower goes 750 feet from homes.
Planning and Zoning Board — October 6, 2026 · 57:05 →Asked for transparency on which existing towers were evaluated for co-location and what alternative sites were considered and rejected.
Planning and Zoning Board — October 6, 2026 · 1:00:36 →Argues new nearby towers weren't on the coverage maps, co-location isn't happening, and wants concealment design or reduced height if the site is approved.
Planning and Zoning Board — October 6, 2026 · 1:03:02 →Spoke on behalf of first-time homeowner friends in Heritage Oaks — asked whether residents would want an unsightly tower in their own backyards.
Planning and Zoning Board — October 6, 2026 · 1:06:50 →A Heritage Oaks resident who opposes the tower near homes and points to a lower-profile 'coastal style' tower a quarter mile away as an alternative.
Planning and Zoning Board — October 6, 2026 · 1:09:40 →