Flock cameras
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Flock license plate recognition cameras→At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 24, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Urged the council to cancel the Flock contract, citing AI misreads, abuse cases, and data harvesting by a private company.
City Council — August 24, 2026 · 11:37 →Asked the council to reconsider the costly Flock contract, saying the city was safe before the cameras and residents don't want to be tracked.
City Council — August 24, 2026 · 14:23 →Called for canceling all ALPR contracts, citing national data sharing and saying she's lost confidence in the council's research.
City Council — August 24, 2026 · 19:32 →Cited a delayed public records response, called the surveillance unconstitutional, and warned of Fourth Amendment lawsuits.
City Council — August 24, 2026 · 22:42 →Urged ending the Flock contract, tying it to broader distrust of government surveillance.
City Council — August 24, 2026 · 32:22 →Noted the Flock contract has cost $266,000 and continuing it would push that to $455,000 — a 70%+ increase.
City Council — August 24, 2026 · 38:32 →Described how a mischaracterized 2024 arrest still shadows her housing search, warning AI-driven enforcement will magnify such errors.
City Council — August 24, 2026 · 45:02 →Said he was nearly hit by an e-bike rider on a sidewalk, questioned a $60–80 million soccer stadium proposal near Midport, and criticized Flock cameras pointing into public parks.
City Council — August 10, 2026 · 8:27 →