Development
Mims Crossing industrial proposal
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (3)
Related issue
Mims Crossing industrial proposal→At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Sep 2, 2026.
Public comments (3)
OpposedAnthony ChildsSep 2, 2026
Says the project would dwarf Mulberry and Fort Meade, overload the two-lane road, and leave the area with just one ambulance.
Planning Commission — September 2, 2026 · 2:06:10 →OpposedCrystal TimmSep 2, 2026
Says she never got a mailer, the area floods, traffic is awful, and wildlife would be affected; signed the petition.
Planning Commission — September 2, 2026 · 2:11:30 →OpposedKati MarshallSep 2, 2026
Says promised second mail notices never arrived, submitted flooding photos of her property, and asked for more time to understand the shrunken plan.
Planning Commission — September 2, 2026 · 2:13:58 →