Limedale accessory variance
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 14, 2026.
Public comments (4)
Asked whether the barn would be commercial storage, then read a statement urging denial to protect the Green Swamp's wildlife and tranquility, noting she'd been led to believe it was a commercial project.
Polk County Land Use Hearing Officer — July 14, 2026 · 30:05 →Claimed the barn was built without a permit, used for parties and others' storage, and that piled lumber is disrupting water flow; said residents don't want it there.
Polk County Land Use Hearing Officer — July 14, 2026 · 34:51 →Said wood piled at the line blocks water flow to the swamp, questioned a shooting range near wildlife, and reported traffic leaving the property at 70–80 mph.
Polk County Land Use Hearing Officer — July 14, 2026 · 38:09 →Formally asked the board to deny the 2,400-square-foot structure, arguing accessory buildings must stay subordinate, that after-the-fact approvals set bad precedent, and that commercial vehicles are stored there.
Polk County Land Use Hearing Officer — July 14, 2026 · 41:21 →