Florida Record
Polk County
Development

Crews Lake Subdivision

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (5)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 6, 2026.

Public comments (5)

OpposedSue NelsonMay 6, 2026

Representing six five-acre deed-restricted lots, she argued the 400-home plan lacks adequate public facilities, citing 18-19-foot McCall Road widths, substandard Crews Lake Drive, and discrepancies between county crash data and Roads and Drainage records showing 32 crashes.

Planning Commission — May 6, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedMark LaneMay 6, 2026

An adjoining property owner and attorney argued the application fails all four required findings and urged denial, noting no cumulative traffic study and schools at capacity.

Planning Commission — May 6, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedCharles MonikinoMay 6, 2026

A Tremont resident disputed the developer's example home, described frequent crashes into poles and fences on Crews Lake Road, and suggested revenue motives outweigh safety.

Planning Commission — May 6, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedEd SmithMay 6, 2026

A Tremont resident said only three of ten opponents at the DRC meeting were invited to Pulte's community meeting, raised Hurricane Milton stormwater overflow into Crews Lake, loss of century-old oaks, and incompatible 50-foot lots and 12-foot berm/fence walls.

Planning Commission — May 6, 2026 · 0:00 →
OpposedTracy ParkerMay 6, 2026

A Crews Wood Lane resident clarified her street is a ten-home cul-de-sac, not a subdivision, and warned about the dangerous un-signalized crossing at McCall Road.

Planning Commission — May 6, 2026 · 0:00 →