Crews Lake Subdivision
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 6, 2026.
Public comments (5)
Representing six five-acre deed-restricted lots, she argued the 400-home plan lacks adequate public facilities, citing 18-19-foot McCall Road widths, substandard Crews Lake Drive, and discrepancies between county crash data and Roads and Drainage records showing 32 crashes.
Planning Commission — May 6, 2026 · 0:00 →An adjoining property owner and attorney argued the application fails all four required findings and urged denial, noting no cumulative traffic study and schools at capacity.
Planning Commission — May 6, 2026 · 0:00 →A Tremont resident disputed the developer's example home, described frequent crashes into poles and fences on Crews Lake Road, and suggested revenue motives outweigh safety.
Planning Commission — May 6, 2026 · 0:00 →A Tremont resident said only three of ten opponents at the DRC meeting were invited to Pulte's community meeting, raised Hurricane Milton stormwater overflow into Crews Lake, loss of century-old oaks, and incompatible 50-foot lots and 12-foot berm/fence walls.
Planning Commission — May 6, 2026 · 0:00 →A Crews Wood Lane resident clarified her street is a ten-home cul-de-sac, not a subdivision, and warned about the dangerous un-signalized crossing at McCall Road.
Planning Commission — May 6, 2026 · 0:00 →