Environment

Tree Preservation Ordinance

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (3)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jan 6, 2026.

Public comments (5)

OpposedJulia BartunekJan 6, 2026

Asked to restore native tree species lists, add waterway plantings, keep ISA arborist language, and raise or remove the $3,500 cap to $10,000/acre.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 6, 2026 · 3:09:23 →
ConcernedNancy HazelwoodJan 6, 2026

Wanted the cap raised to $10,000/acre, more native species, and objected to exemptions for small commercial sites and minor rural subdivisions in the Northeast Rural Area.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 6, 2026 · 3:12:34 →
OpposedJasmine ForcanJan 6, 2026

Described clear-cutting along Little Road and Hudson Avenue, urged preserving every tree possible and removing or raising the cap.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 6, 2026 · 3:15:02 →
OpposedCindi BuckelJan 6, 2026

Showed photos of 50-75-year-old oaks bulldozed; urged no cap or a $10,000 minimum and protections for pine trees used by eagles.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 6, 2026 · 35:11 →
SupportiveKatherine CapelloJan 6, 2026

Supported no cap, citing property values, habitat, hurricane buffering, and climate benefits; invited the board to Arbor Day in New Port Richey.

Board of County Commissioners - Jan 6, 2026 · 3:22:31 →