Zoning

Shady Hills rezoning (PC3)

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (2)

At a glance

Public comments
3
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 21, 2026.

Public comments (3)

OpposedThomas SaladoMay 21, 2026

Opposed the C-2 rezoning, citing two-lane road safety, four nearby schools, comprehensive plan inconsistency, and unpermitted portable storage visible in photos he submitted.

Planning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 17:07 →
OpposedDanelle CurlMay 21, 2026

Urged denial, citing safety risks to schoolchildren, noise and lighting, inadequate infrastructure, groundwater and flooding risks from commercial development.

Planning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 20:51 →
SupportiveMichael RazorMay 21, 2026

A transportation consultant testified the one-acre commercial yield meets level-of-service D standards on Shady Hills Road and noted the road is planned for widening to four lanes.

Planning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 26:31 →