Shady Hills rezoning (PC3)
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Shady Hills Road commercial rezoning (PC3)→At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 21, 2026.
Public comments (3)
Opposed the C-2 rezoning, citing two-lane road safety, four nearby schools, comprehensive plan inconsistency, and unpermitted portable storage visible in photos he submitted.
Planning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 17:07 →Urged denial, citing safety risks to schoolchildren, noise and lighting, inadequate infrastructure, groundwater and flooding risks from commercial development.
Planning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 20:51 →A transportation consultant testified the one-acre commercial yield meets level-of-service D standards on Shady Hills Road and noted the road is planned for widening to four lanes.
Planning Commission - May 21, 2026 · 26:31 →