Mitras rezoning
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 11, 2026.
Public comments (6)
A 59-year Kent Grove resident opposed the project, citing Ryles Branch wetlands, the Pithlachascotee River corridor, lack of water/sewer, and the rural character of the community.
Planning Commission - Jun 11, 2026 · 3:45:01 →Raised shared FEMA flood zone A concerns, road flooding, dust from the dirt road, and asked for guarantees against flooding and for the north entrance to be paved.
Planning Commission - Jun 11, 2026 · 3:47:15 →Warned the area connects to the Pithlachascotee River Preserve, floods during heavy rain, and called any such development incompatible with the rural community.
Planning Commission - Jun 11, 2026 · 3:50:12 →Asked the commission to hold evening meetings per state statute so working residents can attend, and mentioned area flooding concerns.
Planning Commission - Jun 11, 2026 · 4:11:20 →Said the $375,000 road contribution is insufficient, the paving only served the developer, and questioned why maximum density is sought when the future land use is lower.
Planning Commission - Jun 11, 2026 · 3:54:27 →An emotional appeal about protecting sacred rural land, wildlife, and clean water from developers who, she said, only see profit.
Planning Commission - Jun 11, 2026 · 3:56:40 →