Zoning
Fairy Avenue vacation (Ordinance 3318)
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Supportive (2)Opposed (1)Concerned (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 4
Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 27, 2026.
Public comments (4)
ConcernedUnidentified Resident (614 May Avenue)Oct 27, 2026
Asked why only part of the alley was being vacated when neighbors use it, and noted the sewer line running through it serves city customers.
City Commission Meetings - Oct 27, 2026 · 1:38:00 →SupportiveMark MulliganOct 27, 2026
The property owner said vacating the dead-end strip makes engineering sense for developing the land and asked that construction trucks be kept off the neighborhood streets.
City Commission Meetings - Oct 27, 2026 · 1:39:34 →OpposedCathy GreenOct 13, 2026
Lives at 1308 Fairy Ave and asked that construction traffic for the new subdivision use Lisenby Avenue, not her quiet residential street where children play.
City Commission Meetings - Oct 13, 2026 · 19:55 →SupportiveMark MulliganOct 13, 2026
The property owner explained the road is unpaved and runs through woods, and he intends to fence it off — construction won't use Fairy Avenue.
City Commission Meetings - Oct 13, 2026 · 22:32 →