Public Safety
Fire Rescue and Police Concurrency Levels of Service Amendment
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (2)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 6, 2026.
Public comments (4)
OpposedKimberly RezankaMay 6, 2026
Opposed the comprehensive plan amendment on behalf of JKM Acquisition LLC, arguing lack of supporting data, conflict with statutory definitions, and potential violation of SB 180.
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting - May 6, 2026 · 2:03:50 →OpposedBill BattinMay 6, 2026
Opposed the amendment, arguing that scattered lot development and traffic have a greater impact on emergency services than new rules solve.
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting - May 6, 2026 · 2:13:20 →OpposedBill BattinApr 1, 2026
Expressed opposition to the police and fire concurrency amendment, arguing it could pave the way for non-ad valorem special assessments without a ballot vote.
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting - Apr 1, 2026 · 4:16:40 →OpposedKimberly RezankaApr 1, 2026
Argued that the comprehensive plan amendment lacked required data and analysis and urged the board to table the item.
Planning & Zoning Board Meeting - Apr 1, 2026 · 4:22:00 →