Development
CPA26-011 Future Land Use Map Amendment
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 10, 2026.
Public comments (1)
OpposedNancy RozellAug 10, 2026
Strongly opposed the commercial FLUM amendment on SR 200, citing negative impacts on neighboring residential properties, traffic safety issues, buffering concerns, and over-intensification of a small parcel.
Board of County Commissioners - Aug 10, 2026 · 52:59 →