Nurenberg variance (File 2026-102)
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 26, 2026.
Public comments (4)
A neighbor argued the variance criteria weren't met, citing that a compliant smaller house fit without relief, and that the lot and street flood every king tide.
Planning Commission Hearing - Aug 26, 2026 · 1:34:21 →A professional engineer and neighbor questioned the 10-foot shoreline setback versus the 20-foot Corps-approved plan, the expired federal permit, and the swale design.
Planning Commission Hearing - Aug 26, 2026 · 1:38:09 →The applicant asked the commission to approve the limited three-foot variance, noting the lot's unique configuration and that staff found all criteria met.
Planning Commission Hearing - Aug 26, 2026 · 1:43:03 →A neighbor on Hakluyt Lane described impassable road flooding every two weeks and objected to the raised fill so close to the water, worried it will channel water toward her.
Planning Commission Hearing - Aug 26, 2026 · 1:46:19 →