Zoning
Telecommunication tower (260702SU)
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Supportive (1)Opposed (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 2
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 26, 2026.
Public comments (2)
SupportiveWilliam Todd OvercashOct 26, 2026
The property owner argued the county's proposed tower site IS contaminated land per EPA flow data, accused the county of violating federal law by denying while negotiating, and threatened to activate attorneys.
Planning & Zoning Commission — October 26, 2026 · 2:09:34 →OpposedFrank Houston McCain IIOct 26, 2026
Asked the board to deny the tower, saying it would sit less than 200 feet behind his planned house; he wants it on the big county dump property instead.
Planning & Zoning Commission — October 26, 2026 · 2:14:52 →