Rudnianyn cell tower

She urged denial, citing health concerns for a 55-plus neighborhood, unproven long-term RF risks, and property value drops of 10-30% near towers.

A resident within 500 feet of the site cited NIH-cited research labeling non-ionizing radiation a possible carcinogen and asked commissioners about financial disclosure requirements and whether any commissioners live near macro towers.

The homeowner directly behind the site questioned why a fourth tower is needed when her phone coverage is fine and asked why residents get notices if the board can't say no.

A 44-year resident and retired teacher within 500 feet of the site said he shares the health and property value concerns and called the tower an eyesore that's redundant with three existing towers.