Florida Record
Marion County
Development

Agricultural look-back

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
1
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 18, 2026.

Public comments (3)

OpposedDavid TillmanMay 18, 2026

An engineer said the five-year ag look-back tramples right-to-farm concerns, warned aerial-photo tree counts can't distinguish species, and called the 13-trees-per-acre shade requirement excessive for commercial sites.

Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Meeting — May 18, 2026 · 1:14:11 →
OpposedJohn RudyaniMay 18, 2026

A property owner described his own "Rudyani loophole" concern — pine trees planted 25-30 years ago on commercially owned property — and said the Right to Farm Act should let him remove them without penalty.

Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Meeting — May 18, 2026 · 1:20:03 →
OpposedSadrudianiMay 18, 2026

Said a five-year look-back incentivizes landowners in the path of development to clear-cut now; also reported self-storage examples where the proposed code raised costs five- or six-fold, forcing six-figure mitigation payments.

Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing Meeting — May 18, 2026 · 1:22:58 →