Fair at Margate Temporary Use Agreement

Urged the board to vote down the carnival, citing past fights, late payments, and neighborhood disruption.

Expressed concerns about the meeting time and ongoing issues with businesses and visitors during the fair.

Highlighted social media-driven fights and suggested stricter escrow and upfront payment requirements if approved.

Argued the carnival is a net burden rather than a benefit, citing trash, congestion, and public safety strain.

Stated that senior communities experience increased crime and fear during the carnival period.

Voiced safety concerns regarding carnival ride structural integrity and rising local crime rates.

Agreed that the carnival should not return due to escalating violence and payment issues.

Spoke as legal counsel for Hildebrand Amusement Rides, defending security plans and requesting approval.

Defended his operational record, security spending, and community contributions while disputing city claims.

Chief of Police testified that officers are mandated to work the detail and do not feel safe supporting the carnival.