Zoning

Short-Term Rental Regulation

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (2)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Sep 2, 2026.

Public comments (6)

ConcernedMartha FlynnSep 2, 2026

Showed a map of 29 STRs in her Pine Meadow neighborhood, said anything over 12 occupants is hard to manage, and offered her neighborhood as a test case for the rollout.

Board of County Commissioners Special/Work Session — September 2, 2026 · 2:16:37 →
OpposedErin DavilaSep 2, 2026

Argued STRs are 'transient lodging' under the county's own zoning code and shouldn't be allowed in residential zones — a definition she traced back to 1989-1990.

Board of County Commissioners Special/Work Session — September 2, 2026 · 2:20:05 →
MixedJohn McNaughtSep 2, 2026

An STR owner who welcomed guardrails but urged the board to base occupancy caps on the state fire marshal's 150 sq ft rule rather than the building code's exit table.

Board of County Commissioners Special/Work Session — September 2, 2026 · 2:24:16 →
ConcernedSean DavilaSep 2, 2026

Said the historical zoning code needs to be reviewed and answered before spending heavily, and disagreed with the 150 sq ft occupancy standard.

Board of County Commissioners Special/Work Session — September 2, 2026 · 2:27:32 →
SupportiveLiz ChoeSep 2, 2026

An STR owner who shared thank-you messages from multigenerational family guests and asked for fair, consistent rules that target bad actors without punishing responsible hosts.

Board of County Commissioners Special/Work Session — September 2, 2026 · 2:35:04 →
OpposedLinda SeyboldSep 2, 2026

An STR owner who opposed growing government and new spending, saying existing laws including state sex-offender rules should simply be enforced.

Board of County Commissioners Special/Work Session — September 2, 2026 · 2:41:01 →