Development

Ivy Run rezoning

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (5)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 11, 2026.

Public comments (5)

OpposedMark VanderyJun 11, 2026

Speaking for the Waterline Road Preservation Group, he presented photos of the road flooding nearly every year, argued wetlands were never delineated, and said Waterline Road is a substandard, crumbling 20-foot road that cannot handle more traffic.

Planning Commission — June 11, 2026 · 2:09:47 →
OpposedKathy McKinnonJun 11, 2026

Presented a concurrency challenge under comp plan Policy 5.2.2.1, showed the county's own Rye Road hot-spot data and past 6-0 denials of nearby projects, and called the proposed traffic light a 'sales tool' that would create an engineered bottleneck.

Planning Commission — June 11, 2026 · 4:41:12 →
OpposedGregory MorenoJun 11, 2026

Acknowledged the applicant's collaboration but argued the traffic light ignores corridor-wide failure, proposed alternatives (permanent conservation or 38 half-acre homes matching Mill Creek), and asked for a third denial in seven years.

Planning Commission — June 11, 2026 · 4:51:34 →
OpposedTim AlmeterJun 11, 2026

A nearly 50-year Waterline Road resident described water four feet deep over the road near the Purcell Ranch low spot and said flooding is inevitable regardless of stormwater design.

Planning Commission — June 11, 2026 · 5:00:51 →
OpposedLarry LouJun 11, 2026

A 40-year resident said Rye Road hasn't been widened since it was paved, both project exits sit on flood-prone Waterline Road, and asked for denial until Rye Road is improved.

Planning Commission — June 11, 2026 · 5:03:13 →