Flock cameras
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 11, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Agreed with Ms. Parker, then said the Flock cameras go against constitutional rights and the Fourth Amendment.
City Commission - Aug 11, 2026 · 0:00 →Called Flock cameras unconstitutional mass surveillance of citizens and read statistics.
City Commission - Aug 11, 2026 · 0:00 →Invoking 'sins of omission,' argued Flock enables wrongful arrests and warrantless tracking, criticized the deputy chief for refusing his questions, and demanded a dedicated Flock town hall taught by a police subject-matter expert.
City Commission - Jul 28, 2026 · 2:33:34 →Said 'defund Flock' outright, described being repeatedly stopped via a 'pocket warrant' despite living out of state, warned about repeating rights violations, and asked media to publicize the memorial garden volunteer effort.
City Commission - Jul 28, 2026 · 2:37:01 →Countered the anti-Flock comments, describing the human-verification safeguards he learned about from Deputy Chief Enfinger and comparing Flock's maturation to DNA evidence — imperfect, but worth refining rather than scrapping.
City Commission - Jul 28, 2026 · 2:43:30 →Said the 4-1 December vote on Flock was a rubber stamp, data is shared with 1,300-1,500 agencies, and threatened to make Flock the top election issue in April if nothing changes.
City Commission - Jun 23, 2026 · 46:02 →