Moholland Drive monopole

Rural property owner said the tower would harm farming, wildlife, and property values and demanded the county intervene.

A local realtor said the tower has already frozen property sales in the area and questioned whether a real coverage gap exists.

An electrical contractor with an implanted cardiac device said RF radiation could interfere with his ICD and formally requested denial.

A wildlife expert and rancher on Wildcat Drive argued microwave radiation would harm livestock, wildlife and his family, and demanded corrective process.

An ICU nurse and expectant mother cited health research and demanded the approvals be reversed.

A 100-acre landowner alleged notice was never properly mailed and accused staff of fraud, demanding all approvals be revoked.

An AG-2 landowner raising horses and children said she never got the required notice or letter of no objection and demanded denial.

A cattle farmer and landowner demanded revocation, questioned AT&T's need for the tower, and requested coverage and radiation documentation.

Owner of Moholland Farms, within 1,250 feet, said he never received notice and demanded the process be made right.

A 24-year-old who inherited adjacent farmland said the tower would destroy the community's beekeeping and ranching livelihood and asked the board to revoke approvals.

A fruit farmer and beekeeper on Wildcat Drive said his two-bar phone service works fine, so no tower is needed, and asked for revocation or remand.