Coastal Waste special exception
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Feb 9, 2026.
Public comments (6)
A resident since 1975 living behind the site said dust and noise prevent her grandchildren from playing outside and beautification won't fix health concerns.
City Commission Meeting — February 9, 2026 · 3:12:07 →Representing SA Recycling, argued the proposal is still a junkyard inconsistent with the comprehensive plan and warned SA Recycling would seek to reopen if approved.
City Commission Meeting — February 9, 2026 · 3:13:59 →A self-employed trash hauler and father of five urged keeping the yard open, saying quick service there keeps food on his table without government assistance.
City Commission Meeting — February 9, 2026 · 3:16:38 →SA Recycling's regional manager played videos of heavy equipment at the site and said his company was forced to close while the competitor kept operating.
City Commission Meeting — February 9, 2026 · 3:18:00 →The West Ken Lark HOA president reported residents complained about property damage near the plant and said the commission's decision should serve area beautification.
City Commission Meeting — February 9, 2026 · 40:55 →A SA Recycling facility manager challenged commissioners to visit his Pompano site, claiming identical noise, dust, and operations to the site in question.
City Commission Meeting — February 9, 2026 · 3:23:06 →