Tiger Paw PUD revision
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 3, 2026.
Public comments (5)
A local real estate broker and Tiger Paw Estates homeowner urged approval, saying fewer, larger homes raise everyone's property values.
Planning and Zoning Board - Jun 3, 2026 · 21:09 →Golf course co-owner strongly opposed, saying he needs the original PUD density to redevelop his closed nine holes and keep the just-renovated course alive.
Planning and Zoning Board - Jun 3, 2026 · 23:09 →Neighbor on Bel Reef voiced support, saying the developer does good work and the project would benefit the community.
Planning and Zoning Board - Jun 3, 2026 · 27:03 →Raised traffic concerns at the Monte Vista/SR 50 intersection and increased coyote and wildlife encounters as open land is lost.
Planning and Zoning Board - Jun 3, 2026 · 27:53 →Engineer for the applicant said the project reduces density from 66 to 29 units, is nearing St. Johns Water Management District approval, and meets comp plan and LDRs.
Planning and Zoning Board - Jun 3, 2026 · 29:47 →