Tiger Paw Estates PUD
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 6, 2026.
Public comments (4)
A Swiss Fairways-area property owner asked whether the PUD conversion would affect his land and future dormitory development plans.
Board of County Commissioners - Oct 6, 2026 · 2:12:00 →The applicant's engineer described the request as a density reduction from 36 villas to 29 single-family units that preserves the rural character and maintains PUD requirements.
Board of County Commissioners - Jul 14, 2026 · 1:18:00 →A Tiger Paw homeowner and real estate broker urged approval, saying fewer, larger homes would raise property values throughout Swiss Fairways and strengthen the tax base.
Board of County Commissioners - Jul 14, 2026 · 1:21:17 →The Swiss Fairways owner claimed the PUD is his, said the golf course land was wrongly taken in a real estate deal, and objected to the applicant converting his density, leaving his 48 acres undevelopable.
Board of County Commissioners - Jul 14, 2026 · 1:22:58 →