Benham FLU/rezone

Showed the concept plan uses a private one-lane road the applicant doesn't own, with three connections, and said children walk that road to school buses — questioned siting industry on a private lane.

Played a 30-second video of CR 448A traffic — already at 95 percent of peak capacity, projected at 99 percent — and asked the county to consider cumulative corridor impacts.

The adjoining landowner asked what water and stormwater studies exist, cited Lake Griffin flooding history, and questioned the cumulative impact of industrial projects along CR 448.

One of five Lake Lena Lane owners; asked what happens if the owners refuse access, and raised stormwater and the MP/data center connection as 'really, really scary.'

Her Opal Lane property borders three proposed warehouses; she asked about setbacks, noise, truck traffic, and property values, and implored denial.

Another Lake Lena Lane owner: no easement exists, the diagram is wrong, and she asked the Benham property to match the Hurley ordinance's 35-foot height cap and berms.

Said the MP zoning could invite a data center at the end of their road, cited flooding on the private lane and 99 percent road capacity, and asked for denial of both items.