Development
St. Nicholas PUD Amendment
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (3)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 21, 2026.
Public comments (3)
OpposedLouis JosephJul 21, 2026
Expressed strong opposition to the St. Nicholas PUD amendment, citing severe traffic growth on Atlantic Boulevard and dangerous ingress/egress conditions.
Land Use & Zoning Committee — July 21, 2026 · 1:26:15 →OpposedMichael MiltonJul 21, 2026
Objected to the St. Nicholas PUD change as a vague 'blank check' for commercial uses, noting widespread neighborhood concern over traffic and alcohol sales.
Land Use & Zoning Committee — July 21, 2026 · 1:28:39 →OpposedSteve MatchettJul 21, 2026
Criticized the St. Nicholas PUD amendment for replacing a previously agreed residential plan with intensive commercial uses that would generate over 10,000 daily trips.
Land Use & Zoning Committee — July 21, 2026 · 1:32:01 →