Proposed Jail Site Selection and Historical Redlining Resolution
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 19, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Expressed support for Resolution 2026-0356, arguing that historically redlined neighborhoods need protection and should not bear the burden of a new jail.
Finance Committee — May 19, 2026 · 33:26 →Criticized city leadership regarding neighborhood disinvestment and neighborhood boundaries, calling for focus on neighborhood stabilization.
Finance Committee — May 19, 2026 · 35:42 →Urged the committee to support Resolution 2026-0356, stating that placing a jail in a redlined community perpetuates racism and bigotry.
Finance Committee — May 19, 2026 · 37:43 →Asked the committee to support Resolution 2026-0356 as a symbolic, cost-free gesture toward historical justice.
Finance Committee — May 19, 2026 · 39:33 →Argued against concentrating institutional burdens and over-saturating historically marginalized communities with negative developments.
Finance Committee — May 19, 2026 · 43:34 →Urged passage of Resolution 2026-0356 to draw a line in the sand and show that redlined communities deserve protection from industrial burdens.
Finance Committee — May 19, 2026 · 45:40 →Expressed opposition to placing a jail on the Northside, stating it continues patterns of redlining and disinvestment.
Finance Committee — May 19, 2026 · 48:12 →