Orangebrook development agreement
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 6
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Nov 5, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Questioned the entity name changes in the amendment, opposed private buildings on public land, and demanded wildlife protections for burrowing owls and a committed timeline with penalties for delay.
City Commission (Regular) - Nov 5, 2026 · 58:11 →Self-described golfer supporting the project, praising the developer's engagement with residents and comparing it favorably to Shell Bay.
City Commission (Regular) - Nov 5, 2026 · 43:32 →Hollywood Hills resident supporting the developer, praising communication with the Orangebrook Revitalization Committee.
City Commission (Regular) - Nov 5, 2026 · 1:47:38 →Read a letter from the Orangebrook Revitalization Committee supporting the modified site plan after a decade of involvement.
City Commission (Regular) - Nov 5, 2026 · 1:49:45 →Lifelong resident arguing the 2000 deed restrictions require voter approval for changes and that the agreement may be an improper use of public land; also skeptical the extra water storage helps since the C-10 canal is right there.
City Commission (Regular) - Nov 5, 2026 · 1:52:43 →Committee member and golfer who's excited for the lit par-3 course and the inclusive design process.
City Commission (Regular) - Nov 5, 2026 · 1:56:30 →