Chinsegut Hill Management Agreement
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Chinsegut Hill Management Agreement→At a glance
- Public comments
- 11
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jan 29, 2026.
Public comments (11)
Spoke about committee procedures and past meetings.
Board of County Commissioners — January 29, 2026 · 9:40 →Noted that the Tampa Bay History Center was not consulted on the FAMU proposal and that agreements would need renegotiation.
Board of County Commissioners — January 29, 2026 · 2:12:30 →Supported FAMU's proposal and noted agricultural potential on the property.
Board of County Commissioners — January 29, 2026 · 2:14:24 →Expressed difficulty in accessing Chinsegut Hill previously and supported FAMU's educational use.
Board of County Commissioners — January 29, 2026 · 2:17:27 →Defended the preservation society's past management success and criticized university management proposals.
Board of County Commissioners — January 29, 2026 · 2:23:05 →Pointed out that USF previously relinquished management when economic times got tough.
Board of County Commissioners — January 29, 2026 · 2:23:37 →Spoke as a FAMU employee and graduate in support of FAMU's community engagement and research.
Board of County Commissioners — January 29, 2026 · 2:40:00 →Expressed trust in FAMU's educational mission and history preservation.
Board of County Commissioners — January 29, 2026 · 2:29:44 →Spoke for the Sierra Club supporting the preservation society to keep the site open to the public.
Board of County Commissioners — January 29, 2026 · 2:32:03 →Raised concerns about trust and past solar farm impacts near her neighborhood.
Board of County Commissioners — January 29, 2026 · 2:36:38 →Expressed support for FAMU and urged clear contract terms protecting public interests.
Board of County Commissioners — January 29, 2026 · 3:07:00 →