287(g) Agreement

Requested the city rescind the 287(g) agreement and shared a psychological study about fear and attraction.

Criticized the city for voluntarily giving up home rule powers and urged deeper legal review of ordinances and agreements.

Called on the city to rescind the 287(g) immigration agreement and raised concerns about public records access.

Expressed strong opposition to the city's support of the 287(g) immigration enforcement agreement, arguing it fosters fear and division.

Urged the city council to rescind the 287(g) agreement, citing systemic legal, training, and ethical concerns associated with immigration enforcement policies.

Expressed concern that the 287(g) ICE agreement harms immigrants, creates fear, and forces police into improper roles.

Urged the Council to challenge and rescind the 287(g) agreement through legal action.

Expressed concern that partnering with ICE damages the police department's reputation and ethics.

Shared fears experienced by immigrant families and argued the agreement is harmful and undemocratic.

Criticized the Council for reversing its stance under state pressure and called for reopening public debate.

Highlighted the emotional and psychological impact of immigration enforcement on children.

Described witnessing arrests near schools and urged the Council to show courage and end the agreement.

Reiterated her request to rescind the 287(g) agreement and defended her prior remarks regarding legal arguments.

Criticized the Council's legal questioning on complex matters and urged rescinding the 287(g) agreement.

Urged the city council to rescind the 287(g) immigration enforcement agreement and shared reflections on advocacy and standing up against fear.