Development

SE26-109 RC Hill expansion

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (1)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
3
Last 30 days
0

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 16, 2026.

Public comments (3)

ConcernedScott StrackingSep 16, 2026

A South Florida Avenue resident asked for mitigation of light pollution, security lighting spill, noise, and grease/oil runoff toward drinking water wells, and no construction or car-carrier traffic on the dirt road.

Planning Board - Sep 16, 2026 · 1:26:03 →
OpposedMark DaySep 16, 2026

A mechanic at the lowest point of the road showed photos of flooding and a trench he cut himself, described 4 a.m. noise, and warned the proposed drainage will clog and flood his home — his life savings.

Planning Board - Sep 16, 2026 · 1:28:40 →
ConcernedJoe StegmanSep 16, 2026

A retired builder next door calculated 140,000+ gallons of runoff from one inch of rain, questioned whether the ground can absorb it, cited flooded neighbors and wildlife including gopher tortoises and barred owls, and complained the posted sign's phone line went unanswered for weeks.

Planning Board - Sep 16, 2026 · 1:35:06 →