City Charter Amendment Proposal for Four-Year Terms

Supported four-year terms for council members to provide stability and reduce campaign pressures, but opposed term limit resets.

Spoke in favor of four-year terms, stating it helps council members work together smoothly and saves election costs.

Stated opposition to any reset provision for term limits, arguing eight years should be a hard cap.

Supported four-year terms with no reset, noting two years is too short to accomplish productive work.

Supported four-year terms to allow council members to follow through on plans, and suggested thorough voter education.

Expressed opposition to changing terms, referencing past failed charter votes and emphasizing voter accountability.

Supported four-year terms for stability but strongly opposed any reset clause for term limits.