Duke Energy 30-Year Franchise Agreement Renewal
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Duke Energy 30-Year Franchise Agreement Renewal→At a glance
- Public comments
- 22
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 16, 2026.
Public comments (22)
Spoke on behalf of Duke Energy in support of renewing the franchise agreement and highlighting partnership benefits.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 14:00 →Expressed support for renewing the Duke Energy agreement, noting that municipalization would be too costly and complex.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 16:55 →Raised concerns about poor customer service from Duke Energy regarding damaged property and slow response times.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 18:25 →Voiced support for establishing a municipal utility to keep profits local and provide democratic control.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 19:46 →Argued that a municipal utility could save residents millions in rate reductions compared to Duke's profit-driven model.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 25:42 →Expressed frustration with rising electric bills and urged council to help struggling residents.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 26:38 →Supported public power and questioned why the city is not pursuing the savings shown in the feasibility study.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 32:29 →Shared negative experiences with Duke Energy in multiple states and supported a public utility.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 27:50 →Praised the feasibility study and appraisal findings, urging council not to lock residents into a 30-year contract.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 29:29 →Urged the city to negotiate a better deal or follow Winter Park's example in establishing municipal power.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 32:34 →Praised the council for initiating the feasibility study but questioned the sudden pivot back to Duke.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 57:45 →Asked the council to take a step back, conduct public education on the appraisal results, and avoid a 30-year commitment.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 39:05 →Raised concerns about beach transformer maintenance and above-ground power lines in downtown Clearwater.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 39:07 →Shared negative experience with municipalization efforts in Colorado and questioned the savings projected from buying only the distribution system.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 43:54 →Urged caution before committing the city to another 30-year agreement without fully exploring feasibility study findings.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 43:57 →Detailed ongoing unaddressed damage to her roof caused by an aging utility pole and lack of response from claims handlers.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 48:43 →Praised Duke Energy's weatherization programs in North Greenwood that reduced bills for low-income residents.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 51:19 →Shared past experience with failed municipalization efforts in Belleair and highlighted staffing and union challenges.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 51:37 →Expressed appreciation for Duke Energy's ongoing support of local business and entrepreneurial programs through Amplify Clearwater.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 55:00 →Argued that Duke is the most expensive utility in Florida and cited Winter Park as a successful municipal example.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 1:36:40 →Spoke in favor of public power and lower rates for the middle class.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 1:00:58 →Urged the council to consider long-term climate resilience, sea level rise, and renewable energy investments before signing a 30-year deal.
City Council — July 16, 2026 · 1:03:59 →