Port Everglades planning consultant ranking
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 26, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Representing Moffatt & Nichol, noted his firm ranked number one in both evaluation rounds and asked the board to preserve that position.
County Commission — March 26, 2026 · 3:04:48 →Argued the second evaluation committee violated the procurement code's equity provisions, Hatch did nothing wrong, and asked the board to honor the first ranking or award three contracts.
County Commission — March 26, 2026 · 3:05:46 →Representing Moffatt & Nichol, urged a decision today, noting there is no bid protest and the second ranking carries the least legal risk.
County Commission — March 26, 2026 · 3:14:05 →Bowman Consulting's business unit director thanked the board and procurement for the redo process and said his team stands ready to serve the county.
County Commission — March 26, 2026 · 3:15:30 →Hatch principal agreed to waive protest rights to enable the compromise three-contract outcome.
County Commission — March 26, 2026 · 3:28:15 →Volkert's business unit manager clarified the firm's rankings in both evaluation rounds for the record.
County Commission — March 26, 2026 · 3:29:14 →