ALPRs
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Sep 3, 2026.
Public comments (4)
Said the city pays three ALPR vendors (Axon, Vigilant, Flock) and demanded permanent removal, not suspension, citing Institute for Justice data that only 0.1% of plate reads connect to crimes.
City Commission - Sep 3, 2026 · 1:39 →Argued 'suspension' isn't removal — a suspended camera can be turned back on tomorrow — and urged the city to follow Oviedo's lead in banning ALPRs.
City Commission - Sep 3, 2026 · 3:34 →Asked why the promised public briefing on ALPRs wasn't on the agenda and requested a complete public inventory of devices, ownership, data access and retention; distributed a fact sheet.
City Commission - Sep 3, 2026 · 4:31 →Returned to argue surveillance powers become normalized, FDOT rescinded ALPR permits on state roads, and the burden of proof should be on government.
City Commission - Sep 3, 2026 · 3:22:50 →